On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 12:44 AM Ferruh Yigit
wrote:
> On 2/6/2018 10:33 AM, zhouyangchao wrote:
> > Physical addresses in the fifo named alloc_q need to be traversed to
> > release in user space. The physical address to the virtual address
> > conversion in kernel space is much better.
>
> Yes c
On 2/6/2018 10:33 AM, zhouyangchao wrote:
> Physical addresses in the fifo named alloc_q need to be traversed to
> release in user space. The physical address to the virtual address
> conversion in kernel space is much better.
Yes current approach should be slower but this is not in data path, thi
Physical addresses in the fifo named alloc_q need to be traversed to
release in user space. The physical address to the virtual address
conversion in kernel space is much better.
Signed-off-by: Yangchao Zhou
---
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_dev.h | 1 +
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_misc.
Physical addresses in the fifo named alloc_q need to be traversed to release
in user space. The physical address to the virtual address conversion in
kernel space is much better.
Signed-off-by: Yangchao Zhou
---
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_dev.h | 1 +
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_misc.
4 matches
Mail list logo
