[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_pmd_fm10k: Fix max_vfs issue in fm10k PMD

2015-06-02 10:28, Michael Qiu: > In DPDK, max_vfs means vf numbers created, not the max number vfs > the device supported. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Qiu > Acked-by Jing Chen Applied, thanks

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_pmd_fm10k: Fix max_vfs issue in fm10k PMD

In DPDK, max_vfs means vf numbers created, not the max number vfs the device supported. Signed-off-by: Michael Qiu Acked-by Jing Chen --- lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_pmd_fm10k: Fix max_vfs issue in fm10k PMD

On 6/1/2015 9:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-05-12 05:30, Qiu, Michael: >> Hi, thomas >> >> What about this patch? > It seems this patch was not *really* sent to dev at dpdk.org. > Please re-send, keeping the Acked-by line. OK, I will resend it. Thanks, Michael >> On 4/16/2015 4:09 PM,

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_pmd_fm10k: Fix max_vfs issue in fm10k PMD

2015-05-12 05:30, Qiu, Michael: > Hi, thomas > > What about this patch? It seems this patch was not *really* sent to dev at dpdk.org. Please re-send, keeping the Acked-by line. > On 4/16/2015 4:09 PM, Chen, Jing D wrote: > > From: Michael Qiu [mailto:qiudayu at cn.ibm.com] > >> From: Michael

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_pmd_fm10k: Fix max_vfs issue in fm10k PMD

Hi, thomas What about this patch? Thanks, Michael On 4/16/2015 4:09 PM, Chen, Jing D wrote: > Hi, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Michael Qiu [mailto:qiudayu at cn.ibm.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 5:25 PM >> To: dev at dpdk.org >> Cc: Chen, Jing D; Qiu, Michael >> Subject:

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_pmd_fm10k: Fix max_vfs issue in fm10k PMD

Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Michael Qiu [mailto:qiudayu at cn.ibm.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 5:25 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Chen, Jing D; Qiu, Michael > Subject: [PATCH] librte_pmd_fm10k: Fix max_vfs issue in fm10k PMD > > From: Michael Qiu > > In DPDK, max_vfs