Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] malloc: don't skip pad on free

2018-07-20 Thread Thomas Monjalon
19/07/2018 18:37, Andrew Rybchenko: > On 19.07.2018 12:42, Anatoly Burakov wrote: > > Previously, we were skipping erasing pad because we were > > expecting it to be freed when we were merging adjacent > > segments. However, if there were no adjacent segments to > > merge, we would've skipped erasi

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] malloc: don't skip pad on free

2018-07-19 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 19.07.2018 12:42, Anatoly Burakov wrote: Previously, we were skipping erasing pad because we were expecting it to be freed when we were merging adjacent segments. However, if there were no adjacent segments to merge, we would've skipped erasing the pad, leaving non-zero memory in our free spac

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] malloc: don't skip pad on free

2018-07-19 Thread Anatoly Burakov
Previously, we were skipping erasing pad because we were expecting it to be freed when we were merging adjacent segments. However, if there were no adjacent segments to merge, we would've skipped erasing the pad, leaving non-zero memory in our free space. Fix this by including pad in the erasing u