[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: clarify comment on adding TX offload flags

2015-07-16 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-15 12:16, Olivier MATZ: > On 07/09/2015 03:22 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > The comment for TX offload flags stated that those flags started at bit > > 55 and then were added to the right of that, leaving 8 bits reserved for > > generic mbuf (i.e. non-offload) use. This comment may not

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: clarify comment on adding TX offload flags

2015-07-15 Thread Olivier MATZ
On 07/09/2015 03:22 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > The comment for TX offload flags stated that those flags started at bit > 55 and then were added to the right of that, leaving 8 bits reserved for > generic mbuf (i.e. non-offload) use. This comment may not have been > clear as 5 of the 8 flags

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: clarify comment on adding TX offload flags

2015-07-09 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-09 14:22, Bruce Richardson: > The comment for TX offload flags stated that those flags started at bit > 55 and then were added to the right of that, leaving 8 bits reserved for > generic mbuf (i.e. non-offload) use. This comment may not have been > clear as 5 of the 8 flags which were

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: clarify comment on adding TX offload flags

2015-07-09 Thread Eduard Gibert
Hello, I am trying to run any DPDK application in my machine but I'm unable to do so because it always hangs after the print "EAL: Setting up memory.." That applies to all of the DPDK applications. Anyone has any ideas on why this is happening? Thanks, Eduard Gibert Renart 2015-07-09 9:22