TAILQ_ENTRY next is not needed in struct mbuf_dynfield_elt and
mbuf_dynflag_elt, since they are actually chained by rte_tailq_entry's
next field when calling TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(mbuf_dynfield/dynflag_list, te,
next).
Fixes: 4958ca3a443a ("mbuf: support dynamic fields and flags")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Hi Xialong,
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 01:29:55PM +0800, Xiaolong Ye wrote:
> TAILQ_ENTRY next is not needed in struct mbuf_dynfield_elt and
> mbuf_dynflag_elt, since they are actually chained by rte_tailq_entry's
> next field when calling TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(mbuf_dynfield/dynflag_list, te,
> next).
>
On 06/09, Olivier Matz wrote:
>Hi Xialong,
>
>On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 01:29:55PM +0800, Xiaolong Ye wrote:
>> TAILQ_ENTRY next is not needed in struct mbuf_dynfield_elt and
>> mbuf_dynflag_elt, since they are actually chained by rte_tailq_entry's
>> next field when calling TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(mbuf_dy
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 15:15:33 +0800
Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> On 06/09, Olivier Matz wrote:
> >Hi Xialong,
> >
> >On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 01:29:55PM +0800, Xiaolong Ye wrote:
> >> TAILQ_ENTRY next is not needed in struct mbuf_dynfield_elt and
> >> mbuf_dynflag_elt, since they are actually chained by r
On 06/09, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 15:15:33 +0800
>Ye Xiaolong wrote:
>
>> On 06/09, Olivier Matz wrote:
>> >Hi Xialong,
>> >
>> >On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 01:29:55PM +0800, Xiaolong Ye wrote:
>> >> TAILQ_ENTRY next is not needed in struct mbuf_dynfield_elt and
>> >> mbuf_dynfl
5 matches
Mail list logo