Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] memory: do not use base-virtaddr in secondary processes

19/06/2018 11:21, Burakov, Anatoly: > On 18-Jun-18 8:53 PM, Dariusz Stojaczyk wrote: > > Since secondary process' address space is highly dictated > > by the primary process' mappings, it doesn't make much > > sense to use base-virtaddr for secondary processes. > > > > This patch is intended to fi

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] memory: do not use base-virtaddr in secondary processes

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Burakov, Anatoly < anatoly.bura...@intel.com> wrote: > On 19-Jun-18 11:23 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Burakov, Anatoly < >> anatoly.bura...@intel.com > wrote: >> >> On 18-Jun-18 9:1

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] memory: do not use base-virtaddr in secondary processes

On 19-Jun-18 11:23 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Burakov, Anatoly mailto:anatoly.bura...@intel.com>> wrote: On 18-Jun-18 9:12 PM, Stojaczyk, DariuszX wrote: -Original Message- From: Alejandro Lucero [mailto:al

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] memory: do not use base-virtaddr in secondary processes

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Burakov, Anatoly < anatoly.bura...@intel.com> wrote: > On 18-Jun-18 9:12 PM, Stojaczyk, DariuszX wrote: > >> >> >> -Original Message- >>> From: Alejandro Lucero [mailto:alejandro.luc...@netronome.com] >>> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 9:33 PM >>> >>> On Mon,

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] memory: do not use base-virtaddr in secondary processes

On 18-Jun-18 9:12 PM, Stojaczyk, DariuszX wrote: -Original Message- From: Alejandro Lucero [mailto:alejandro.luc...@netronome.com] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 9:33 PM On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 8:03 PM, Stojaczyk, DariuszX mailto:dariuszx.stojac...@intel.com> > wrote: Can you po

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] memory: do not use base-virtaddr in secondary processes

On 18-Jun-18 8:53 PM, Dariusz Stojaczyk wrote: Since secondary process' address space is highly dictated by the primary process' mappings, it doesn't make much sense to use base-virtaddr for secondary processes. This patch is intended to fix PCI resource mapping in secondary processes using the

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] memory: do not use base-virtaddr in secondary processes

> -Original Message- > From: Alejandro Lucero [mailto:alejandro.luc...@netronome.com] > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 9:33 PM > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 8:03 PM, Stojaczyk, DariuszX > mailto:dariuszx.stojac...@intel.com> > > wrote: > > Can you point me out to an NFP guide or some c

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] memory: do not use base-virtaddr in secondary processes

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 8:03 PM, Stojaczyk, DariuszX < dariuszx.stojac...@intel.com> wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Alejandro Lucero [mailto:alejandro.luc...@netronome.com] > > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 7:22 PM > > > > Should not be better to handle these allocations being awa

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] memory: do not use base-virtaddr in secondary processes

> -Original Message- > From: Alejandro Lucero [mailto:alejandro.luc...@netronome.com] > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 7:22 PM > > Should not be better to handle these allocations being aware about the > problem for secondary processes? > > I do not know exactly what are the (other) reasons

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] memory: do not use base-virtaddr in secondary processes

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 8:53 PM, Dariusz Stojaczyk < dariuszx.stojac...@intel.com> wrote: > Since secondary process' address space is highly dictated > by the primary process' mappings, it doesn't make much > sense to use base-virtaddr for secondary processes. > > This patch is intended to fix PCI

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] memory: do not use base-virtaddr in secondary processes

Since secondary process' address space is highly dictated by the primary process' mappings, it doesn't make much sense to use base-virtaddr for secondary processes. This patch is intended to fix PCI resource mapping in secondary processes using the same base-virtaddr as their primary processes. PC