On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 16:50:40 +
"Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"
wrote:
> > Why does this not use abstract unix domain socket naming?
> > That would be much less error prone, because then the socket would
> > disappear when all applications using it are closed.
> Why does this not use abstract unix domain socket naming?
> That would be much less error prone, because then the socket would
> disappear when all applications using it are closed.
How would that work with containers? I'll consider that for a new patch, maybe
it could be optional?
On 10/22/2019 5:08 PM, Jakub Grajciar wrote:
> Define MEMIF_SOCKET_UN_SIZE to size of unix domain socket address.
> Report error in case of longer path.
>
> Fixes: b923866c6974 ("net/memif: allow for full key size in socket name")
> Cc: step...@networkplumber.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Grajciar
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:08:29 +0200
Jakub Grajciar wrote:
> Cc: step...@networkplumber.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Grajciar
> ---
> doc/guides/nics/memif.rst | 2 +-
> drivers/net/memif/memif_socket.c | 27 +++
> drivers/net/memif/memif_socket.h | 6 --
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ferruh Yigit
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 6:33 PM
> To: Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: step...@networkplumber.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/memif: fix invalid unix do
Define MEMIF_SOCKET_UN_SIZE to size of unix domain socket address.
Report error in case of longer path.
Fixes: b923866c6974 ("net/memif: allow for full key size in socket name")
Cc: step...@networkplumber.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Grajciar
---
doc/guides/nics/memif.rst | 2 +-
drivers/n
6 matches
Mail list logo
