On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:11:14AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:30:33 +0100
> Bruce Richardson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:53:26AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:31:08 +0200
> > > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >
> > > > 22/07/
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:30:33 +0100
Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:53:26AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:31:08 +0200
> > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > > 22/07/2019 19:13, Stephen Hemminger:
> > > > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > Are
23/07/2019 20:29, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:59:04 +0200
> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> > 22/07/2019 20:34, Stephen Hemminger:
> > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:31:08 +0200
> > > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >
> > > > 22/07/2019 19:13, Stephen Hemminger:
> > > > > Thomas Monjalon w
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:59:04 +0200
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 22/07/2019 20:34, Stephen Hemminger:
> > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:31:08 +0200
> > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > > 22/07/2019 19:13, Stephen Hemminger:
> > > > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > Are the constructors run on dlopen
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:30:33 +0100
Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:53:26AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:31:08 +0200
> > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > > 22/07/2019 19:13, Stephen Hemminger:
> > > > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > Are
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:53:26AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:31:08 +0200
> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> > 22/07/2019 19:13, Stephen Hemminger:
> > > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > Are the constructors run on dlopen of the bus driver?
> > >
> > > Yes, constructor
22/07/2019 20:34, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:31:08 +0200
> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> > 22/07/2019 19:13, Stephen Hemminger:
> > > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > Are the constructors run on dlopen of the bus driver?
> > >
> > > Yes, constructors are run on dlopen.
> > > But
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:31:08 +0200
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 22/07/2019 19:13, Stephen Hemminger:
> > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Are the constructors run on dlopen of the bus driver?
> >
> > Yes, constructors are run on dlopen.
> > But application should not have to ask DPDK to dlopen the
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:31:08 +0200
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 22/07/2019 19:13, Stephen Hemminger:
> > Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Are the constructors run on dlopen of the bus driver?
> >
> > Yes, constructors are run on dlopen.
> > But application should not have to ask DPDK to dlopen the
22/07/2019 19:13, Stephen Hemminger:
> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Are the constructors run on dlopen of the bus driver?
>
> Yes, constructors are run on dlopen.
> But application should not have to ask DPDK to dlopen the bus devices.
>
> The core principle is that dynamic build of DPDK should ac
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:04:55 +0200
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 22/07/2019 18:43, Stephen Hemminger:
> > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:06:11 +0100
> > Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 09:38:27AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 19/07/2019 22:55, Stephen Hemminger:
> > > >
22/07/2019 18:43, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:06:11 +0100
> Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 09:38:27AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 19/07/2019 22:55, Stephen Hemminger:
> > > > The root cause is that recent gcc won't run constructor on unused
> > > > l
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:06:11 +0100
Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 09:38:27AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 19/07/2019 22:55, Stephen Hemminger:
> > > On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:46:04 +0100
> > > Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 05:19:12PM -070
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 09:38:27AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 19/07/2019 22:55, Stephen Hemminger:
> > On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:46:04 +0100
> > Bruce Richardson wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 05:19:12PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:41:36 -0700
> > >
19/07/2019 22:55, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:46:04 +0100
> Bruce Richardson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 05:19:12PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:41:36 -0700
> > > Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > >
> > > > If DPDK is built as a shared libra
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:46:04 +0100
Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 05:19:12PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:41:36 -0700
> > Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >
> > > If DPDK is built as a shared library, then any application linked
> > > with rte.app.mk
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:46:04 +0100
Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 05:19:12PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:41:36 -0700
> > Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >
> > > If DPDK is built as a shared library, then any application linked
> > > with rte.app.mk
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:46:04 +0100
Bruce Richardson wrote:
> I don't think the position of these is going to be the cause here, the more
> likely cause is that the pci bus driver - and all other drivers - are not
> linked into apps for shared library builds. You always need to pass "-d"
> paramet
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:46:04 +0100
Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 05:19:12PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:41:36 -0700
> > Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >
> > > If DPDK is built as a shared library, then any application linked
> > > with rte.app.mk
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 05:19:12PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:41:36 -0700
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> > If DPDK is built as a shared library, then any application linked
> > with rte.app.mk will not find any PCI devices. When the application
> > is started no ethe
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:41:36 -0700
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> If DPDK is built as a shared library, then any application linked
> with rte.app.mk will not find any PCI devices. When the application
> is started no ethernet devices are found.
>
> This is because the link order of libraries on the
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:41:36 -0700
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> If DPDK is built as a shared library, then any application linked
> with rte.app.mk will not find any PCI devices. When the application
> is started no ethernet devices are found.
>
> This is because the link order of libraries on the
If DPDK is built as a shared library, then any application linked
with rte.app.mk will not find any PCI devices. When the application
is started no ethernet devices are found.
This is because the link order of libraries on the command line matters.
And PCI is before EAL. That causes there to be no
23 matches
Mail list logo