Sure, I'm sending it again with your suggestions.
Lazaros.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Bruce Richardson
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 06:58:45PM +0200, Lazaros Koromilas wrote:
>> Issuing a zero objects dequeue with a single consumer has no effect.
>> Doing so with multiple consumers,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 06:58:45PM +0200, Lazaros Koromilas wrote:
> Issuing a zero objects dequeue with a single consumer has no effect.
> Doing so with multiple consumers, can get more than one thread to succeed
> the compare-and-set operation and observe starvation or even deadlock in
> the
Issuing a zero objects dequeue with a single consumer has no effect.
Doing so with multiple consumers, can get more than one thread to succeed
the compare-and-set operation and observe starvation or even deadlock in
the while loop that checks for preceding dequeues. The problematic piece
of code
3 matches
Mail list logo