Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] service: improve service run performance

2019-10-17 Thread David Marchand
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:37 PM Van Haaren, Harry wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Marchand [mailto:david.march...@redhat.com] > > Sent: Monday, October 7, 2019 3:53 PM > > To: Van Haaren, Harry > > Cc: dev ; Rao, Nikhil > > Subject:

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] service: improve service run performance

2019-10-07 Thread Van Haaren, Harry
> -Original Message- > From: David Marchand [mailto:david.march...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, October 7, 2019 3:53 PM > To: Van Haaren, Harry > Cc: dev ; Rao, Nikhil > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] service: improve service run performance > > On Mon, Sep 16,

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] service: improve service run performance

2019-10-07 Thread David Marchand
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 12:01 PM Nikhil Rao wrote: > > For a valid service, the core mask of the service > is checked against the current core and the corresponding > entry in the active_on_lcore array is set or reset. > > Upto 8 cores share the same cache line for their > service active_on_lcore

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] service: improve service run performance

2019-10-07 Thread Eads, Gage
> For a valid service, the core mask of the service > is checked against the current core and the corresponding > entry in the active_on_lcore array is set or reset. > Upto 8 cores share the same cache line for their > service active_on_lcore array entries since each entry is a uint8_t. > Some num

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] service: improve service run performance

2019-09-16 Thread Nikhil Rao
For a valid service, the core mask of the service is checked against the current core and the corresponding entry in the active_on_lcore array is set or reset. Upto 8 cores share the same cache line for their service active_on_lcore array entries since each entry is a uint8_t. Some number of these