[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/mcslock: remove unneeded per-lcore copy

2020-11-04 Thread Olivier Matz
Each core already comes with its local storage for mcslock (in its stack), therefore there is no need to define an additional per-lcore mcslock. Fixes: 32dcb9fd2a22 ("test/mcslock: add MCS queued lock unit test") Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz --- app/test/test_mcslock.c | 16 ++-- 1 f

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/mcslock: remove unneeded per-lcore copy

2021-01-15 Thread David Marchand
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 6:05 PM Olivier Matz wrote: > > Each core already comes with its local storage for mcslock (in its > stack), therefore there is no need to define an additional per-lcore > mcslock. > > Fixes: 32dcb9fd2a22 ("test/mcslock: add MCS queued lock unit test") > > Signed-off-by: Oli

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/mcslock: remove unneeded per-lcore copy

2020-11-04 Thread Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > Each core already comes with its local storage for mcslock (in its stack), > therefore there is no need to define an additional per-lcore mcslock. > > Fixes: 32dcb9fd2a22 ("test/mcslock: add MCS queued lock unit test") > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz > --- > app/test/test_mcslock.c | 16

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/mcslock: remove unneeded per-lcore copy

2020-11-04 Thread Olivier Matz
Hi Honnappa, On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 05:57:19PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote: > > > > > > Each core already comes with its local storage for mcslock (in its stack), > > therefore there is no need to define an additional per-lcore mcslock. > > > > Fixes: 32dcb9fd2a22 ("test/mcslock: add MC

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/mcslock: remove unneeded per-lcore copy

2020-11-04 Thread Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > > > Each core already comes with its local storage for mcslock (in its > > > stack), therefore there is no need to define an additional per-lcore > mcslock. > > > > > > Fixes: 32dcb9fd2a22 ("test/mcslock: add MCS queued lock unit test") > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz Reviewed-by