Each core already comes with its local storage for mcslock (in its
stack), therefore there is no need to define an additional per-lcore
mcslock.
Fixes: 32dcb9fd2a22 ("test/mcslock: add MCS queued lock unit test")
Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz
---
app/test/test_mcslock.c | 16 ++--
1 f
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 6:05 PM Olivier Matz wrote:
>
> Each core already comes with its local storage for mcslock (in its
> stack), therefore there is no need to define an additional per-lcore
> mcslock.
>
> Fixes: 32dcb9fd2a22 ("test/mcslock: add MCS queued lock unit test")
>
> Signed-off-by: Oli
>
> Each core already comes with its local storage for mcslock (in its stack),
> therefore there is no need to define an additional per-lcore mcslock.
>
> Fixes: 32dcb9fd2a22 ("test/mcslock: add MCS queued lock unit test")
>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz
> ---
> app/test/test_mcslock.c | 16
Hi Honnappa,
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 05:57:19PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Each core already comes with its local storage for mcslock (in its stack),
> > therefore there is no need to define an additional per-lcore mcslock.
> >
> > Fixes: 32dcb9fd2a22 ("test/mcslock: add MC
> > >
> > > Each core already comes with its local storage for mcslock (in its
> > > stack), therefore there is no need to define an additional per-lcore
> mcslock.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 32dcb9fd2a22 ("test/mcslock: add MCS queued lock unit test")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz
Reviewed-by
5 matches
Mail list logo