On 2016/04/08 15:14, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 10:45:33AM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> On 2016/04/08 2:20, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> If the vhost PMD were configured with more queues than the guest, the old
> code would segfault in rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification du
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 10:45:33AM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2016/04/08 2:20, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> If the vhost PMD were configured with more queues than the guest, the old
> >>> code would segfault in rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification due to a NULL
> >>> virtqueue pointer.
> >>>
On 2016/04/08 2:20, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> If the vhost PMD were configured with more queues than the guest, the old
>>> code would segfault in rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification due to a NULL
>>> virtqueue pointer.
>>>
>>> Fixes: ee584e9710b9 ("vhost: add driver on top of the library")
>>> Si
On 4/7/2016 11:29 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
>> On 4/7/2016 8:29 AM, Rich Lane wrote:
>>> If the vhost PMD were configured with more queues than the guest, the
>> old
>>> code would segfault in rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification due to a NULL
>>> virtqueue pointer.
>>>
>>> Fixes: ee584e9710b9 ("vh
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 05:29:06PM -0700, Rich Lane wrote:
> If the vhost PMD were configured with more queues than the guest, the old
> code would segfault in rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification due to a NULL
> virtqueue pointer.
>
> Fixes: ee584e9710b9 ("vhost: add driver on top of the library")
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 03:29:32PM +, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> > On 4/7/2016 8:29 AM, Rich Lane wrote:
> > > If the vhost PMD were configured with more queues than the guest, the
> > old
> > > code would segfault in rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification due to a NULL
> > > virtqueue pointer.
> > >
Hi,
On 4/7/2016 8:29 AM, Rich Lane wrote:
> If the vhost PMD were configured with more queues than the guest, the old
> code would segfault in rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification due to a NULL
> virtqueue pointer.
>
> Fixes: ee584e9710b9 ("vhost: add driver on top of the library")
> Signed-off-by:
> > If the vhost PMD were configured with more queues than the guest, the old
> > code would segfault in rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification due to a NULL
> > virtqueue pointer.
> >
> > Fixes: ee584e9710b9 ("vhost: add driver on top of the library")
> > Signed-off-by: Rich Lane
>
> Acked-by: Yua
> On 4/7/2016 8:29 AM, Rich Lane wrote:
> > If the vhost PMD were configured with more queues than the guest, the
> old
> > code would segfault in rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification due to a NULL
> > virtqueue pointer.
> >
> > Fixes: ee584e9710b9 ("vhost: add driver on top of the library")
> > Sig
>
> If the vhost PMD were configured with more queues than the guest, the old
> code would segfault in rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification due to a NULL
> virtqueue pointer.
>
> Fixes: ee584e9710b9 ("vhost: add driver on top of the library")
> Signed-off-by: Rich Lane
> ---
> drivers/net/vhost/
If the vhost PMD were configured with more queues than the guest, the old
code would segfault in rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification due to a NULL
virtqueue pointer.
Fixes: ee584e9710b9 ("vhost: add driver on top of the library")
Signed-off-by: Rich Lane
---
drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c | 5
11 matches
Mail list logo