[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: use zeroed memory for simple TX header

2016-04-05 Thread Yuanhan Liu
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 03:57:11PM -0700, Rich Lane wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Yuanhan Liu > wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 03:13:37PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Huawei, Yuanhan, any comment? > > > > 2016-03-31 13:01, Rich Lane: > > >? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: use zeroed memory for simple TX header

2016-04-05 Thread Yuanhan Liu
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 03:13:37PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Huawei, Yuanhan, any comment? > > 2016-03-31 13:01, Rich Lane: > > vq->vq_ring.desc[i + mid_idx].next = i; > > vq->vq_ring.desc[i + mid_idx].addr = > > -

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: use zeroed memory for simple TX header

2016-04-04 Thread Rich Lane
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 03:13:37PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Huawei, Yuanhan, any comment? > > > > 2016-03-31 13:01, Rich Lane: > > > vq->vq_ring.desc[i + mid_idx].next = i; > > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: use zeroed memory for simple TX header

2016-04-04 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Huawei, Yuanhan, any comment? 2016-03-31 13:01, Rich Lane: > vq->vq_ring.desc[i + mid_idx].next = i; > vq->vq_ring.desc[i + mid_idx].addr = > - vq->virtio_net_hdr_mem + > -

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: use zeroed memory for simple TX header

2016-03-31 Thread Rich Lane
For simple TX the virtio-net header must be zeroed, but it was using memory that had been initialized with indirect descriptor tables. This resulted in "unsupported gso type" errors from librte_vhost. We can use the same memory for every descriptor to save cachelines in the vswitch. Signed-off-by