rm.com;
d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; sta...@dpdk.org; Aman Kumar ;
Grimm, Jon
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Extend --lcores to run on cores >
RTE_MAX_LCORE
[AMD Public Use]
Thanks Thomas for the response.
For a correction, the patchwork has not been submitted for the current LTS
release, 19.11.2, b
n...@redhat.com; ferruh.yi...@intel.com; bl...@debian.org;
>> ktray...@redhat.com; bruce.richard...@intel.com;
>> honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com; d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; sta...@dpdk.org; Aman
>> Kumar ; Grimm, Jon
>> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Extend --lcores to
...@redhat.com; bruce.richard...@intel.com;
> honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com; d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; sta...@dpdk.org; Aman
> Kumar ; Grimm, Jon
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Extend --lcores to run on cores >
> RTE_MAX_LCORE
>
> [AMD Public Use]
>
> Thanks Thomas
David Marchand ; dev@dpdk.org;
acon...@redhat.com; ferruh.yi...@intel.com; bl...@debian.org;
ktray...@redhat.com; bruce.richard...@intel.com; honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com;
d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; sta...@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Extend --lcores to run on cores >
RTE_MAX
ktray...@redhat.com;
bruce.richard...@intel.com; honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com;
d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; sta...@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Extend --lcores to run on cores >
RTE_MAX_LCORE
[CAUTION: External Email]
Hi,
21/01/2020 01:24, Thomas Monjalon:
> 02/12/2019 16:3
.com; Song, Keesang
; bl...@debian.org; ktray...@redhat.com;
bruce.richard...@intel.com; honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com;
d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; sta...@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Extend --lcores to run on cores >
RTE_MAX_LCORE
[CAUTION: External Email]
Hi,
21/01/2020 01:24, Th
29/05/2020 05:05, Song, Keesang:
> Hi Thomas & David,
>
> We haven't got the final status on this patch, and I don't see this change
> even from the latest LTS 20.04 repo.
> So I'd like to confirm whether this patch has been safely submitted to the
> main upstream.
> Can you check the status of
ntel.com; Song, Keesang
; bl...@debian.org; ktray...@redhat.com;
bruce.richard...@intel.com; honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com;
d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; sta...@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Extend --lcores to run on cores >
RTE_MAX_LCORE
[CAUTION: External Email]
Hi,
21/01
On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:48:58 -0500
Aaron Conole wrote:
> David Marchand writes:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 9:19 AM Song, Keesang wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
> >
> > Please, get this header removed.
> > This is a public mailing list.
> >
> >
David Marchand writes:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 9:19 AM Song, Keesang wrote:
>>
>> [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
>
> Please, get this header removed.
> This is a public mailing list.
>
>
>> Thanks Thomas for bringing this up.
>> I consider this is not a new feature, but r
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 9:19 AM Song, Keesang wrote:
>
> [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
Please, get this header removed.
This is a public mailing list.
> Thanks Thomas for bringing this up.
> I consider this is not a new feature, but rather a fix to address the issue
> wi
Hi,
21/01/2020 01:24, Thomas Monjalon:
> 02/12/2019 16:35, David Marchand:
> > We are currently stuck with no option but recompile a DPDK if the system
> > has more cores than RTE_MAX_LCORE.
> > A bit of a pity when you get a system with more than 200+ cores and your
> > testpmd has been built and
02/12/2019 16:35, David Marchand:
> We are currently stuck with no option but recompile a DPDK if the system
> has more cores than RTE_MAX_LCORE.
> A bit of a pity when you get a system with more than 200+ cores and your
> testpmd has been built and packaged with RTE_MAX_LCORE == 128.
>
> The --lc
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 7:37 PM Yigit, Ferruh
wrote:
>
> On 12/2/2019 3:35 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> > We are currently stuck with no option but recompile a DPDK if the system
> > has more cores than RTE_MAX_LCORE.
> > A bit of a pity when you get a system with more than 200+ cores and your
> >
On 12/2/2019 3:35 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> We are currently stuck with no option but recompile a DPDK if the system
> has more cores than RTE_MAX_LCORE.
> A bit of a pity when you get a system with more than 200+ cores and your
> testpmd has been built and packaged with RTE_MAX_LCORE == 128.
Ju
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of David Marchand
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 1:59 PM
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 4:36 PM David Marchand
> wrote:
> >
> > We are currently stuck with no option but recompile a DPDK if the
> system
> > has more cores than RTE_MAX_LCORE.
> >
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 4:36 PM David Marchand wrote:
>
> We are currently stuck with no option but recompile a DPDK if the system
> has more cores than RTE_MAX_LCORE.
> A bit of a pity when you get a system with more than 200+ cores and your
> testpmd has been built and packaged with RTE_MAX_LCORE
We are currently stuck with no option but recompile a DPDK if the system
has more cores than RTE_MAX_LCORE.
A bit of a pity when you get a system with more than 200+ cores and your
testpmd has been built and packaged with RTE_MAX_LCORE == 128.
The --lcores does not need to care about the underlyin
18 matches
Mail list logo
