[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] standard make install

2015-12-02 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 12/02/2015 11:25 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-12-02 09:44, Panu Matilainen: >> That aside, a bigger problem is that it doesn't seem to work. >> >> make clean >> make config T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc >> make >> make install DESTDIR=/tmp/dpdk-root > > Oh, I forgot to test the simple case w

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] standard make install

2015-12-02 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-02 11:47, Panu Matilainen: > On 12/02/2015 11:25 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2015-12-02 09:44, Panu Matilainen: > >> That aside, a bigger problem is that it doesn't seem to work. > >> > >> make clean > >> make config T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc > >> make > >> make install DESTDIR=/tmp/d

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] standard make install

2015-12-02 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-02 09:44, Panu Matilainen: > That aside, a bigger problem is that it doesn't seem to work. > > make clean > make config T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc > make > make install DESTDIR=/tmp/dpdk-root Oh, I forgot to test the simple case where O= is not specified! It should be fixed with this c

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] standard make install

2015-12-02 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 12/02/2015 05:57 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard > installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old > behaviours. > Thank you Mario and Bruce for having submitted other proposals. > I hope there will be a s

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] standard make install

2015-12-02 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Following the recent discussions, this is a proposal to have a standard installation process while keeping compatibility with most of the old behaviours. Thank you Mario and Bruce for having submitted other proposals. I hope there will be a strong consensus for this one. The doc and pkg/dpdk.spec a