Hello Jianbo,
On Monday 12 December 2016 08:05 PM, Jianbo Liu wrote:
Hi Shreyansh,
On 7 December 2016 at 21:10, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
On Wednesday 07 December 2016 05:47 PM, David Marchand wrote:
Hello Shreyansh,
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Shreyansh Jain
wrote:
On Wednesday 07 Dec
Hi Shreyansh,
On 7 December 2016 at 21:10, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 December 2016 05:47 PM, David Marchand wrote:
>>
>> Hello Shreyansh,
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Shreyansh Jain
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 07 December 2016 02:22 AM, David Marchand wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2016 12:51 PM
> To: Shreyansh Jain
> Cc: David Marchand ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver Model
>
> 2016-12-08 10:34, Shreyansh Jain:
2016-12-08 10:34, Shreyansh Jain:
> On Wednesday 07 December 2016 06:54 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-12-07 18:40, Shreyansh Jain:
> >> Is there anything specific that you are looking for in patchset v2?
> >> I was thinking of:
> >> 0. fixing BSD compilation issue reported by CI
> >> 1. impro
On Wednesday 07 December 2016 06:54 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
2016-12-07 18:40, Shreyansh Jain:
Is there anything specific that you are looking for in patchset v2?
I was thinking of:
0. fixing BSD compilation issue reported by CI
1. improving the test_pci.c
2. hotplugging
3. trying to move PCI
2016-12-07 18:40, Shreyansh Jain:
> Is there anything specific that you are looking for in patchset v2?
> I was thinking of:
> 0. fixing BSD compilation issue reported by CI
> 1. improving the test_pci.c
> 2. hotplugging
> 3. trying to move PCI to drives/bus/pci/linux/* and resolving how
> drivers
On Wednesday 07 December 2016 05:47 PM, David Marchand wrote:
Hello Shreyansh,
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
On Wednesday 07 December 2016 02:22 AM, David Marchand wrote:
0002~0003: Introducing the basic Bus model and associated test case
0005: Support insertion
Hello Shreyansh,
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 December 2016 02:22 AM, David Marchand wrote:
>>> 0002~0003: Introducing the basic Bus model and associated test case
>>> 0005: Support insertion of device rather than addition to tail
>>
>>
>> Patch 2
Hello David,
On Wednesday 07 December 2016 02:22 AM, David Marchand wrote:
"Big patchset and a lot of things to look at.
Here is a first look at it.
Thanks for comments.
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
In continuation to the RFC posted on 17/Nov [9],
A series of pa
"Big patchset and a lot of things to look at.
Here is a first look at it.
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> In continuation to the RFC posted on 17/Nov [9],
> A series of patches is being posted which attempts to create:
> 1. A basic bus model
> `- define rte_bus and
DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the
design of device tree (or list) within DPDK is also PCI inclined. A
non-PCI device doesn't have a way of being expressed without using hooks
started from EAL to PMD.
:: Overview of the Proposed Changes ::
Assuming the below g
11 matches
Mail list logo
