From: Lance Richardson
This commit enables the creation of a dedicated completion
ring for asynchronous event handling instead of handling these
events on a receive completion ring.
For the stingray platform and other platforms needing tighter
control of resource utilization, we retain the abili
On 7/18/2019 4:36 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> From: Lance Richardson
>
> This commit enables the creation of a dedicated completion
> ring for asynchronous event handling instead of handling these
> events on a receive completion ring.
>
> For the stingray platform and other platforms needing tig
22/07/2019 16:57, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 7/18/2019 4:36 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> > From: Lance Richardson
> > --- a/config/common_base
> > +++ b/config/common_base
> > @@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_BNX2X_DEBUG_PERIODIC=n
> > # Compile burst-oriented Broadcom BNXT PMD driver
> > #
> > CONF
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:06 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 22/07/2019 16:57, Ferruh Yigit:
> > On 7/18/2019 4:36 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> > > From: Lance Richardson
> > > --- a/config/common_base
> > > +++ b/config/common_base
> > > @@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_BNX2X_DEBUG_PERIODIC=n
On 7/22/2019 6:57 PM, Lance Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:06 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>
>> 22/07/2019 16:57, Ferruh Yigit:
>>> On 7/18/2019 4:36 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
From: Lance Richardson
--- a/config/common_base
+++ b/config/common_base
@@ -212,6 +212,
22/07/2019 20:34, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 7/22/2019 6:57 PM, Lance Richardson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:06 AM Thomas Monjalon
> > wrote:
> >> 22/07/2019 16:57, Ferruh Yigit:
> >>> On 7/18/2019 4:36 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> From: Lance Richardson
> --- a/config/common_base
> >>
Yes, the platform can be detected at runtime
from the PCI device ID. This would be a better
approach than adding a configuration parameter,
I think. I'll take a look.
Thanks,
Lance
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 4:04 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 22/07/2019 20:34, Ferruh Yigit:
> > On 7/22/2019 6:5
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 2:34 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> I dropped this patch from next-net since discussion is going on, I did my best
> to resolve the conflicts but please confirm the final result in next-net.
>
I did some basic testing of the current head of dpdk-next-net and diffed
against the
8 matches
Mail list logo