At last it was suggested to use dynamic ol_flags in mbuf for this
feature. We decided to postpone this since it effects our fast path
performance.
You can remove it from the roadmap.
Thanks
Nithin
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 6:24 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> Please can you remind what was decided f
Please can you remind what was decided for this feature?
I think I should remove it from the roadmap.
17/04/2020 09:22, Nithin Dabilpuram:
> From: Nithin Dabilpuram
>
> Introduce PKT_TX_MARK_IP_DSCP, PKT_TX_MARK_IP_ECN
> and PKT_TX_MARK_VLAN_DEI Tx offload flags to support
> packet marking.
>
Hi,
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 04:48:21PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 12:53 PM Nithin Dabilpuram
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Nithin Dabilpuram
> >
> > Introduce PKT_TX_MARK_IP_DSCP, PKT_TX_MARK_IP_ECN
> > and PKT_TX_MARK_VLAN_DEI Tx offload flags to support
> > packet marking.
>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 12:53 PM Nithin Dabilpuram
wrote:
>
> From: Nithin Dabilpuram
>
> Introduce PKT_TX_MARK_IP_DSCP, PKT_TX_MARK_IP_ECN
> and PKT_TX_MARK_VLAN_DEI Tx offload flags to support
> packet marking.
>
> When packet marking feature in Traffic manager is enabled,
> application has to
From: Nithin Dabilpuram
Introduce PKT_TX_MARK_IP_DSCP, PKT_TX_MARK_IP_ECN
and PKT_TX_MARK_VLAN_DEI Tx offload flags to support
packet marking.
When packet marking feature in Traffic manager is enabled,
application has to the use the three new flags to indicate
to PMD on whether packet marking ne
5 matches
Mail list logo