Hi Konstantin,
On 02/18/2015 11:47 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>>> How was this managed before, since refcnt field seems to be necessary in
>>> order
>>> to effectively manage indirect mbufs? Is this just the case that this is
>>> something
>>> that never worked and that needs to be solved, o
Hi,
On 02/18/2015 11:37 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>>> How was this managed before, since refcnt field seems to be necessary in
>>> order
>>> to effectively manage indirect mbufs? Is this just the case that this is
>>> something
>>> that never worked and that needs to be solved, or is it someth
t;>>>
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 9:36 AM
>>>>> To: Olivier MATZ
>>>>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
>>>
ednesday, February 18, 2015 9:36 AM
>>> To: Olivier MATZ
>>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Remove RTE_MBUF_REFCNT references
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:16:56AM +0100, Olivier MATZ wrote:
>>>> Hi Sergio,
>
Hi Bruce,
On 02/18/2015 10:35 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:16:56AM +0100, Olivier MATZ wrote:
>> Hi Sergio,
>>
>> On 02/16/2015 05:08 PM, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
>>> This patch removes all references to RTE_MBUF_REFCNT, setting the refcnt
>>> field in the mbuf str
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 10:34 AM
> To: Richardson, Bruce
> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Remove RTE_MBUF_REFCNT references
>
8, 2015 at 09:48:58AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> >>>>Hi lads,
> >>>>
> >>>>>-Original Message-
> >>>>>From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson
> >>>>>Sent: Wednesday, Februa
: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson
> >>>Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 9:36 AM
> >>>To: Olivier MATZ
> >>>Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> >>>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Remove RTE_MBUF_REFCNT references
> >>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 10:15 AM
> To: Richardson, Bruce; Ananyev, Konstantin
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Remove RTE_MBUF_REFCNT references
>
Hi Sergio,
On 02/16/2015 05:08 PM, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> This patch removes all references to RTE_MBUF_REFCNT, setting the refcnt
> field in the mbuf struct permanently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
I think removing the refcount compile option goes in the right
direction.
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Remove RTE_MBUF_REFCNT references
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:16:56AM +0100, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> > > Hi Sergio,
> > >
> > > On 02/16/2015 05:08 PM, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote
Hi lads,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 9:36 AM
> To: Olivier MATZ
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Remove RTE_MBUF_REFCNT references
>
&
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:16:56AM +0100, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> Hi Sergio,
>
> On 02/16/2015 05:08 PM, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> >This patch removes all references to RTE_MBUF_REFCNT, setting the refcnt
> >field in the mbuf struct permanently.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
>
This patch removes all references to RTE_MBUF_REFCNT, setting the refcnt
field in the mbuf struct permanently.
Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
---
app/test/test_link_bonding.c| 15 ---
app/test/test_mbuf.c| 17 -
config/common_bsd
14 matches
Mail list logo
