Hi Marius,
>
> Hi,
>
> About your comments:
>
> 1) I used macros around sa->flags where it was needed. Not all checks for that
> set of flags use information if it is transport mode. As for macro
> WITHOUT_TRANSPORT_VERSION, it was set only for checks that required
> information from set of fla
Hi,
About your comments:
1) I used macros around sa->flags where it was needed. Not all checks for that
set of flags use information if it is transport mode. As for macro
WITHOUT_TRANSPORT_VERSION, it was set only for checks that required information
from set of flags without taking into accou
Hi Marius,
Could you please send the updated patch soon, so that they can be applied
before RC1.
Thanks,
Akhil
>
> Hi Marius,
>
>
> > Application ipsec-secgw is not working for IPv4 transport mode and for
> > IPv6 both transport and tunnel mode.
> >
> > IPv6 tunnel mode is not working due to
Hi Marius,
> Application ipsec-secgw is not working for IPv4 transport mode and for
> IPv6 both transport and tunnel mode.
>
> IPv6 tunnel mode is not working due to wrongly assigned fields of
> security association patterns, as it was IPv4, during creation of
> inline crypto session.
>
> IPv6
> -Original Message-
> From: Drost, MariuszX
> Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 11:07 AM
> To: Nicolau, Radu ; akhil.go...@nxp.com; Lu, Wenzhuo
> ; Ananyev, Konstantin
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Drost, MariuszX
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix not working inline ipsec modes
>
>
Application ipsec-secgw is not working for IPv4 transport mode and for
IPv6 both transport and tunnel mode.
IPv6 tunnel mode is not working due to wrongly assigned fields of
security association patterns, as it was IPv4, during creation of
inline crypto session.
IPv6 and IPv4 transport mode is it
6 matches
Mail list logo
