On Thursday 29 June 2017 07:59 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> Hello Ferruh,
>
[...]
>
>>
>>> +
>>> +if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY)
>>> +rte_free(eth_dev->data->dev_private);
>>> +
>>
>> no pmd uninit() ?
Just to clarify, were you asking about uninit of the driver?
Ther
Hello Ferruh,
I was almost wondering if this series has been forgotten. Thanks for
the comprehensive review.
My comments inline (and in some other mails):
On Wednesday 28 June 2017 09:11 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 6/16/2017 6:40 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
A skeleton which would be called after
On 6/16/2017 6:40 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> A skeleton which would be called after bus device scan. It currently
> fails to identify the device>
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
> Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
<...>
> +
> +/* Initialise a network interface */
> +static int dpaa_eth_dev_init(st
A skeleton which would be called after bus device scan. It currently
fails to identify the device.
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
drivers/net/dpaa/Makefile | 64 +
drivers/net/dpaa/dpaa_
4 matches
Mail list logo
