From: Viacheslav Galaktionov <viacheslav.galaktio...@oktetlabs.ru>

The representor support has been implemented to some extent, and the fact
that ethdev mport is equivalent to entity mport is by design.

Fixes: 1fb65e4dae8 ("net/sfc: support flow action port ID in transfer rules")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Galaktionov <viacheslav.galaktio...@oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Andy Moreton <amore...@xilinx.com>
---
 drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae.c
index 7be77054ab..fa60c948ca 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_mae.c
@@ -228,10 +228,7 @@ sfc_mae_attach(struct sfc_adapter *sa)
        sfc_log_init(sa, "assign RTE switch port");
        switch_port_request.type = SFC_MAE_SWITCH_PORT_INDEPENDENT;
        switch_port_request.entity_mportp = &entity_mport;
-       /*
-        * As of now, the driver does not support representors, so
-        * RTE ethdev MPORT simply matches that of the entity.
-        */
+       /* RTE ethdev MPORT matches that of the entity for independent ports. */
        switch_port_request.ethdev_mportp = &entity_mport;
        switch_port_request.ethdev_port_id = sas->port_id;
        rc = sfc_mae_assign_switch_port(mae->switch_domain_id,
-- 
2.30.2

Reply via email to