[dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] dpif-netdev: Add support Intel DPDK based ports.

2014-01-30 Thread Rogers, Gerald
huge acceptance. > >Regards >-Prashant > > >-Original Message- >From: Pravin Shelar [mailto:pshelar at nicira.com] >Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:00 AM >To: Prashant Upadhyaya >Cc: dev at openvswitch.org; dev at dpdk.org; dpdk-ovs at lists.01.org; Gerald

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] dpif-netdev: Add support Intel DPDK based ports.

2014-01-30 Thread Prashant Upadhyaya
helar [mailto:pshe...@nicira.com] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:00 AM To: Prashant Upadhyaya Cc: dev at openvswitch.org; dev at dpdk.org; dpdk-ovs at lists.01.org; Gerald Rogers Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] dpif-netdev: Add support Intel DPDK based ports. On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] dpif-netdev: Add support Intel DPDK based ports.

2014-01-29 Thread Prashant Upadhyaya
ct: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] dpif-netdev: Add support Intel DPDK based ports. From: Pravin B Shelar Following patch adds DPDK netdev-class to userspace datapath. Approach taken in this patch differs from Intel? DPDK vSwitch where DPDK datapath switching is done in saparate process. This patch adds s

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] dpif-netdev: Add support Intel DPDK based ports.

2014-01-29 Thread Pravin Shelar
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote: > Hi Pravin, > > I think your stuff is on the brink of a creating a mini revolution :) > > Some questions inline below -- > +ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk0 -- set Interface dpdk0 type=dpdk > What do you mean by portid here, do you mean

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] dpif-netdev: Add support Intel DPDK based ports.

2014-01-29 Thread Pravin Shelar
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Vincent JARDIN wrote: > Hi Pravin, > > >>> Few feature questions: >>> >>>- what's about the vNIC supports (toward the guests)? >>>- what's about IPsec support (VxLAN over IPsec for instance)? >>> I do not understand how your patch will solve those 2 cases.

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] dpif-netdev: Add support Intel DPDK based ports.

2014-01-29 Thread Vincent JARDIN
Hi Pravin, >> Few feature questions: >>- what's about the vNIC supports (toward the guests)? >>- what's about IPsec support (VxLAN over IPsec for instance)? >> I do not understand how your patch will solve those 2 cases. >> > At this point I wanted to get basic DPDK support in OVS, once t

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] dpif-netdev: Add support Intel DPDK based ports.

2014-01-28 Thread Vincent JARDIN
Hi Pravin, Yes, it is a good integration with http://dpdk.org Few feature questions: - what's about the vNIC supports (toward the guests)? - what's about IPsec support (VxLAN over IPsec for instance)? I do not understand how your patch will solve those 2 cases. >>> This is based a patch fr

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] dpif-netdev: Add support Intel DPDK based ports.

2014-01-28 Thread Pravin Shelar
Hi Vincent, On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Vincent JARDIN wrote: > Hi Pravin, > > Yes, it is a good integration with http://dpdk.org > > Few feature questions: > - what's about the vNIC supports (toward the guests)? > - what's about IPsec support (VxLAN over IPsec for instance)? > I do not

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] dpif-netdev: Add support Intel DPDK based ports.

2014-01-27 Thread pshe...@nicira.com
From: Pravin B Shelar Following patch adds DPDK netdev-class to userspace datapath. Approach taken in this patch differs from Intel? DPDK vSwitch where DPDK datapath switching is done in saparate process. This patch adds support for DPDK type port and uses OVS userspace datapath for switching.