Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/mlx4: improve Rx packet type offloads report

2017-11-08 Thread Adrien Mazarguil
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:33:57PM +, Mordechay Haimovsky wrote: > Inline > > > -Original Message- > > From: Adrien Mazarguil [mailto:adrien.mazarg...@6wind.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 4:58 PM > > To: Mordechay Haimovsky > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1]

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/mlx4: improve Rx packet type offloads report

2017-11-08 Thread Mordechay Haimovsky
Inline > -Original Message- > From: Adrien Mazarguil [mailto:adrien.mazarg...@6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 4:58 PM > To: Mordechay Haimovsky > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] net/mlx4: improve Rx packet type offloads report > > Hi Moti, > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/mlx4: improve Rx packet type offloads report

2017-11-08 Thread Adrien Mazarguil
Hi Moti, On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:02:45PM +0200, Moti Haimovsky wrote: > This patch improves Rx packet type offload report in case the device is > a virtual function device. L2 tunnel indications are not reported by > those devices and therefore should not be checked by the PMD. > > Fixes: aee4

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/mlx4: improve Rx packet type offloads report

2017-11-08 Thread Moti Haimovsky
This patch improves Rx packet type offload report in case the device is a virtual function device. L2 tunnel indications are not reported by those devices and therefore should not be checked by the PMD. Fixes: aee4a03fee4f ("net/mlx4: enhance Rx packet type offloads") Signed-off-by: Moti Haimovsk