On 22/9/2017 2:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
22/09/2017 12:28, Hunt, David:
On 22/9/2017 10:51 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
29/08/2017 15:03, Ananyev, Konstantin:
Hi Dave,
This patchset adds the facility for a guest VM to send a policy down to
the host that will allow the host to scale up/do
22/09/2017 12:28, Hunt, David:
>
> On 22/9/2017 10:51 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 29/08/2017 15:03, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> >> Hi Dave,
> >>
> >>> This patchset adds the facility for a guest VM to send a policy down to
> >>> the host that will allow the host to scale up/down cpu frequencies
> >>
On 22/9/2017 10:51 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
29/08/2017 15:03, Ananyev, Konstantin:
Hi Dave,
This patchset adds the facility for a guest VM to send a policy down to
the host that will allow the host to scale up/down cpu frequencies
depending on the policy criteria independently of the DPDK
29/08/2017 15:03, Ananyev, Konstantin:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> > This patchset adds the facility for a guest VM to send a policy down to
> > the host that will allow the host to scale up/down cpu frequencies
> > depending on the policy criteria independently of the DPDK app running in
> > the guest. Th
Hi Dave,
> This patchset adds the facility for a guest VM to send a policy down to
> the host that will allow the host to scale up/down cpu frequencies
> depending on the policy criteria independently of the DPDK app running in
> the guest. This differs from the previous vm_power implementation
This patchset adds the facility for a guest VM to send a policy down to
the host that will allow the host to scale up/down cpu frequencies
depending on the policy criteria independently of the DPDK app running in
the guest. This differs from the previous vm_power implementation where
individual sc
6 matches
Mail list logo
