Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/7] make rte_intr_handle internal

2021-09-23 Thread David Marchand
Hello Harman, On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 2:42 PM Harman Kalra wrote: > > Moving struct rte_intr_handle as an internal structure to > avoid any ABI breakages in future. Since this structure defines > some static arrays and changing respective macros breaks the ABI. > Eg: > Currently RTE_MAX_RXTX_INTR

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/7] make rte_intr_handle internal

2021-09-15 Thread Harman Kalra
Ping... Kindly review the series. Also would like to request PMD maintainers(who uses interrupt APIs) to validate the series for their respective drivers, as many drivers underwent interrupt related changes in patch 5 of the series. Thanks Harman > -Original Message- > From: Harman Kalr

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/7] make rte_intr_handle internal

2021-09-03 Thread Harman Kalra
Moving struct rte_intr_handle as an internal structure to avoid any ABI breakages in future. Since this structure defines some static arrays and changing respective macros breaks the ABI. Eg: Currently RTE_MAX_RXTX_INTR_VEC_ID imposes a limit of maximum 512 MSI-X interrupts that can be defined for