Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Baum
> Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2020 1:14 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Matan Azrad ; Raslan Darawsheh
> ; Slava Ovsiienko
> Subject: [PATCH v1 00/18] mlx5 Rx DevX/Verbs separation
>
> v1:
> Initial version
>
> Michael Baum (18):
> net/mlx5:
From: Thomas Monjalon:
> 03/09/2020 22:59, Michael Baum:
> > I think the names of the patches describe well enough and there is no
> > need to add a description in the cover-letter.
>
> An introduction giving the general idea, explaining the reason for writing
> these changes, is always appreci
03/09/2020 22:59, Michael Baum:
> I think the names of the patches describe well enough
> and there is no need to add a description in the cover-letter.
An introduction giving the general idea,
explaining the reason for writing these changes,
is always appreciable.
PS: Please do not top-post.
>
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:00 PM Michael Baum wrote:
>
> I think the names of the patches describe well enough and there is no need to
> add a description in the cover-letter.
It gives no hint at the purpose, the impacts... why should we care
about this separation?
--
David Marchand
wsheh
> ; Slava Ovsiienko
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 00/18] mlx5 Rx DevX/Verbs separation
>
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> Could you provide a cover letter?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom
>
> Le 03/09/2020 à 12:
Could you provide a cover letter?
Thanks,
Tom
Le 03/09/2020 à 12:13, Michael Baum a écrit :
v1:
Initial version
Michael Baum (18):
net/mlx5: fix Rx hash queue creation error flow
net/mlx5: fix Rx queue state update
net/mlx5: fix types differentiation in Rxq create
net/mlx5: mitiga
v1:
Initial version
Michael Baum (18):
net/mlx5: fix Rx hash queue creation error flow
net/mlx5: fix Rx queue state update
net/mlx5: fix types differentiation in Rxq create
net/mlx5: mitigate Rx queue reference counters
net/mlx5: separate Rx queue object creations
net/mlx5: separate R
7 matches
Mail list logo
