[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/5] link bonding library

2014-07-02 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2014-06-30 09:28, Doherty, Declan: > > -Original Message- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > > > > Hi Declan, > > > > 2014-06-29 18:49, Declan Doherty: > > > This patchset contains the name change fix in the link bonding library > > > makefile. I have also p

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/5] link bonding library

2014-06-30 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hi Declan, 2014-06-29 18:49, Declan Doherty: > This patchset contains the name change fix in the link bonding library > makefile. I have also put a change into the unit test application makefile > so that the link bonding tests are not built if the library is also not > being built. It doesn't mak

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/5] link bonding library

2014-06-30 Thread Doherty, Declan
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 10:21 AM > To: Doherty, Declan > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/5] link bonding library > > Hi Declan, > > 2014-06-29 18:49, Declan Doherty: > > This patchset

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/5] link bonding library

2014-06-29 Thread Declan Doherty
Hi Thomas, This patchset contains the name change fix in the link bonding library makefile. I have also put a change into the unit test application makefile so that the link bonding tests are not built if the library is also not being built. It doesn't make sense to split the bonding libraries APIs