Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 7:13 PM
> >> To: Shreyansh Jain ; Thomas Monjalon
> >>
> >> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; viktorin at rehivetech.com; David Marchand
> >> ; Hemant Agrawal
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 00/24] Introducing
> rte_driv
2016-10-18 09:04, Neil Horman:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:43:12PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > I caught while running ABI validation script today, I think this patch
> > should increase LIBABIVER of:
> > - lib/librte_cryptodev
> > - lib/librte_eal
> > - lib/librte_ether
> >
> It should, and it
pdk.org; viktorin at rehivetech.com; David Marchand
>> ; Hemant Agrawal
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 00/24] Introducing rte_driver/rte_device
>> generalization
>>
>> On 10/5/2016 12:57 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:43:12PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 10/5/2016 12:57 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > On Tuesday 04 October 2016 01:12 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> 2016-10-04 12:21, Shreyansh Jain:
> >>> Hi Thomas,
> >>>
> >>> On Monday 03 October 2016 07:58 PM, Th
t: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 00/24] Introducing rte_driver/rte_device
> generalization
>
> On 10/5/2016 12:57 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > On Tuesday 04 October 2016 01:12 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> 2016-10-04 12:21, Shreyansh Jain:
>
On 10/5/2016 12:57 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Tuesday 04 October 2016 01:12 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 2016-10-04 12:21, Shreyansh Jain:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> On Monday 03 October 2016 07:58 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
Applied, thanks everybody for the great (re)work!
>>
Hi Thomas,
On Tuesday 04 October 2016 01:12 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-10-04 12:21, Shreyansh Jain:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> On Monday 03 October 2016 07:58 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> Applied, thanks everybody for the great (re)work!
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
[...]
[...]
>>
>> It can be merged with c
Hi Thomas,
On Monday 03 October 2016 07:58 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Applied, thanks everybody for the great (re)work!
Thanks!
>
> 2016-09-20 18:11, Shreyansh Jain:
>> Future Work/Pending:
>> ===
>> - Presently eth_driver, rte_eth_dev are not aligned to the rte_driver/
>>
2016-10-04 12:21, Shreyansh Jain:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Monday 03 October 2016 07:58 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Applied, thanks everybody for the great (re)work!
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > 2016-09-20 18:11, Shreyansh Jain:
> >> Future Work/Pending:
> >> ===
> >> - Presently eth_dri
Applied, thanks everybody for the great (re)work!
2016-09-20 18:11, Shreyansh Jain:
> Future Work/Pending:
> ===
> - Presently eth_driver, rte_eth_dev are not aligned to the rte_driver/
>rte_device model. eth_driver still is a PCI specific entity. This
>has been highlighte
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Shreyansh Jain
wrote:
> Based on master (e15922d75)
>
> Background:
> ===
>
> It includes two different patch-sets floated on ML earlier:
> * Original patch series is from David Marchand [1], [2].
> `- This focused mainly on PCI (PDEV) part
>
Hi Matej,
On Thursday 22 September 2016 12:33 AM, Matej Vido wrote:
> Hi Shreyansh,
>
> I have tested this patch-set with szedata2 driver and it works fine.
>
> Regards,
>
> Matej
Thanks a lot for this.
--
-
Shreyansh
Hi Shreyansh,
I have tested this patch-set with szedata2 driver and it works fine.
Regards,
Matej
On 20.09.2016 14:41, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> Based on master (e15922d75)
>
> Background:
> ===
>
> It includes two different patch-sets floated on ML earlier:
> * Original patch series is
Based on master (e15922d75)
Background:
===
It includes two different patch-sets floated on ML earlier:
* Original patch series is from David Marchand [1], [2].
`- This focused mainly on PCI (PDEV) part
`- v7 of this was posted by me [8] in August/2016
* Patch series [4] from Jan Vi
14 matches
Mail list logo
