Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v19 0/3] Arm build options rework

2021-04-12 Thread Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > It seems that our SoC configuration patches are block by this series: > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=15918 Thank you and appreciate your help. Appreciate updating your patch according to this series. > > I reworked our configuration based on this series and then t

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v19 0/3] Arm build options rework

2021-04-11 Thread Chengchang Tang
On 2021/4/9 16:41, Juraj Linkeš wrote: > The current way of specifying Arm configuration options is insufficient > since we can't identify the SoC we're building for from the MIDR > information. For example, we can't distinguish between N1SDP, Graviton2 > or Ampere Altra. > > We also want to be ab

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v19 0/3] Arm build options rework

2021-04-09 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 2:11 PM Juraj Linkeš wrote: > > The current way of specifying Arm configuration options is insufficient > since we can't identify the SoC we're building for from the MIDR > information. For example, we can't distinguish between N1SDP, Graviton2 > or Ampere Altra. > > We also

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v19 0/3] Arm build options rework

2021-04-09 Thread Juraj Linkeš
The current way of specifying Arm configuration options is insufficient since we can't identify the SoC we're building for from the MIDR information. For example, we can't distinguish between N1SDP, Graviton2 or Ampere Altra. We also want to be able to enable/disable which drivers are built withou