2015-10-30 14:30, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:
> On 21/10/2015 14:01, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> > On 21/10/2015 11:50, Reshma Pattan wrote:
> >> The reorder library unit test was performed under the assumption that
> >> the start
> >> sequence number was always 0.
> >> This is not the case anymor
On 21/10/2015 14:01, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> On 21/10/2015 11:50, Reshma Pattan wrote:
>> The reorder library unit test was performed under the assumption that
>> the start
>> sequence number was always 0.
>> This is not the case anymore as the start sequence number is
>> initialized by t
On 21/10/2015 11:50, Reshma Pattan wrote:
> The reorder library unit test was performed under the assumption that the
> start
> sequence number was always 0.
> This is not the case anymore as the start sequence number is initialized by
> the first
> packet inserted into the reorder buffer.
>
> Th
The reorder library unit test was performed under the assumption that the start
sequence number was always 0.
This is not the case anymore as the start sequence number is initialized by the
first
packet inserted into the reorder buffer.
This patch updates the unit test to reflect the new behavior
4 matches
Mail list logo
