Hi Pablo,
On 07/01/2014 01:44 PM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote:
> Thanks for this. It works fine :)
Thanks for testing!
> Actually, I am thinking of creating a separate test
> for vdev, out of whitelist test, as it has no relation with it. Do you agree
> on this?
I have no problem with that, it
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 1:01 PM
> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: fix vdev test in test_eal_flags
>
> Hi Pabl
Hi Olivier,
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 10:21 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> Cc: olivier.matz at 6wind.com
> Subject: [PATCH v2] app/test: fix vdev test in test_eal_flags
>
> In whitelist te
In whitelist test, within EAL flags unit test, the vdev flag test fails
because it is started in a secondary process, which is not able to
allocate memzones and this is required to instanciate a pmd_ring.
This patch changes the vdev flag test to run it in a primary process.
Patch "app/test: fix b
4 matches
Mail list logo
