On 4/21/20 1:04 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/20/2020 5:10 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 20/04/2020 16:06, Ferruh Yigit:
>>> On 4/18/2020 10:44 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
18/04/2020 07:04, Bill Zhou:
> From: Ferruh Yigit
>> On 4/14/2020 9:32 AM, Dong Zhou wrote:
>>> --- a/lib/lib
21/04/2020 12:04, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 4/20/2020 5:10 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 20/04/2020 16:06, Ferruh Yigit:
> >> On 4/18/2020 10:44 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> 18/04/2020 07:04, Bill Zhou:
> From: Ferruh Yigit
> > On 4/14/2020 9:32 AM, Dong Zhou wrote:
> >> --- a/lib/librt
On 4/20/2020 5:10 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 20/04/2020 16:06, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 4/18/2020 10:44 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 18/04/2020 07:04, Bill Zhou:
From: Ferruh Yigit
> On 4/14/2020 9:32 AM, Dong Zhou wrote:
>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
>> +++ b/lib/librte_
20/04/2020 16:06, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 4/18/2020 10:44 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 18/04/2020 07:04, Bill Zhou:
> >> From: Ferruh Yigit
> >>> On 4/14/2020 9:32 AM, Dong Zhou wrote:
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> @@ -3015,6 +3015,7 @@
On 4/18/2020 10:44 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 18/04/2020 07:04, Bill Zhou:
>> From: Ferruh Yigit
>>> On 4/14/2020 9:32 AM, Dong Zhou wrote:
--- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
@@ -3015,6 +3015,7 @@ enum rte_eth_event_type {
RTE_ETH_EVE
18/04/2020 07:04, Bill Zhou:
> From: Ferruh Yigit
> > On 4/14/2020 9:32 AM, Dong Zhou wrote:
> > > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > > @@ -3015,6 +3015,7 @@ enum rte_eth_event_type {
> > > RTE_ETH_EVENT_NEW, /**< port is probed */
> > > RT
Monjalon
> ; arybche...@solarflare.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: support flow aging
>
> On 4/14/2020 9:32 AM, Dong Zhou wrote:
> > One of the reasons to destroy a flow is the fact that no packet
> > matches the flow for "time
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 23:00:57 +0100
Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/14/2020 9:32 AM, Dong Zhou wrote:
> > One of the reasons to destroy a flow is the fact that no packet matches the
> > flow for "timeout" time.
> > For example, when TCP\UDP sessions are suddenly closed.
> >
> > Currently, there is not
On 4/14/2020 9:32 AM, Dong Zhou wrote:
> One of the reasons to destroy a flow is the fact that no packet matches the
> flow for "timeout" time.
> For example, when TCP\UDP sessions are suddenly closed.
>
> Currently, there is not any DPDK mechanism for flow aging and the
> applications use their o
On 4/14/2020 9:49 AM, Ori Kam wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dong Zhou
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 11:33 AM
>> To: Ori Kam ; Matan Azrad ;
>> wenzhuo...@intel.com; jingjing...@intel.com; bernard.iremon...@intel.com;
>> john.mcnam...@intel.com; marko.kovace...@intel.com; T
> -Original Message-
> From: Ori Kam
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 4:50 PM
> To: Bill Zhou ; Matan Azrad
> ; wenzhuo...@intel.com; jingjing...@intel.com;
> bernard.iremon...@intel.com; john.mcnam...@intel.com;
> marko.kovace...@intel.com; Thomas Monjalon ;
> ferruh.yi...@intel.com; ar
> -Original Message-
> From: Dong Zhou
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 11:33 AM
> To: Ori Kam ; Matan Azrad ;
> wenzhuo...@intel.com; jingjing...@intel.com; bernard.iremon...@intel.com;
> john.mcnam...@intel.com; marko.kovace...@intel.com; Thomas Monjalon
> ; ferruh.yi...@intel.com; ary
One of the reasons to destroy a flow is the fact that no packet matches the
flow for "timeout" time.
For example, when TCP\UDP sessions are suddenly closed.
Currently, there is not any DPDK mechanism for flow aging and the
applications use their own ways to detect and destroy aged-out flows.
The
13 matches
Mail list logo
