; dev@dpdk.org; Stephen Hemminger
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] examples/client_server_mp: check
> > > port ownership
> > >
> > > On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 05:44:55 +
> > > Matan Azrad wrote:
> > >
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 06:37:14 +
Matan Azrad wrote:
> Hi Stephen
>
> From: Stephen Hemminger
> > Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2019 7:47 PM
> > To: Matan Azrad
> > Cc: anatoly.bura...@intel.com; dev@dpdk.org; Stephen Hemminger
> >
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-de
Hi Stephen
From: Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2019 7:47 PM
> To: Matan Azrad
> Cc: anatoly.bura...@intel.com; dev@dpdk.org; Stephen Hemminger
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] examples/client_server_mp: check port
> ownership
>
> On Sun, 7 Jul 201
On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 05:44:55 +
Matan Azrad wrote:
> > + for (count = 0; pm != 0; pm >>= 1, ++count) {
> > + struct rte_eth_dev_owner owner;
> > +
> > + if ((pm & 0x1) == 0)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (count >= max_ports) {
> > +
Hi Stephen
From: Stephen Hemminger
> From: Stephen Hemminger
>
> The mp_server would accept a port mask that included hidden (owned)
> ports and which later caused either lost packets or failed initialization.
>
> This fixes explicitly checks for ownership when parsing the port mask.
>
> Fixes
We need a review here.
04/06/2019 00:28, Stephen Hemminger:
> From: Stephen Hemminger
>
> The mp_server would accept a port mask that included hidden (owned)
> ports and which later caused either lost packets or failed initialization.
>
> This fixes explicitly checks for ownership when parsing
From: Stephen Hemminger
The mp_server would accept a port mask that included hidden (owned)
ports and which later caused either lost packets or failed initialization.
This fixes explicitly checks for ownership when parsing the port mask.
Fixes: 5b7ba31148a8 ("ethdev: add port ownership")
Signed
7 matches
Mail list logo
