t; > Cc: olivier.m...@6wind.com; cw8...@att.com
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf: use refcnt = 0 when debugging
> >
> > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 11:58 +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > >
M
> > > To: Nicolau, Radu ; dev@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: olivier.m...@6wind.com; cw8...@att.com
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf: use refcnt = 0 when debugging
> > >
> > > [Note: My former email address is going away eventually. I am moving the
> > &
er.m...@6wind.com; cw8...@att.com
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf: use refcnt = 0 when debugging
> >
> > [Note: My former email address is going away eventually. I am moving the
> > conversation to my other email address which is a bit more permanent.]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Chas Williams
> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 11:46 AM
> To: Nicolau, Radu ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: olivier.m...@6wind.com; cw8...@att.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf: use refcnt
[Note: My former email address is going away eventually. I am moving the
conversation to my other email address which is a bit more permanent.]
On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 15:27 +0100, Radu Nicolau wrote:
>
> On 8/7/2017 5:11 PM, Charles (Chas) Williams wrote:
> > After commit 8f094a9ac5d7 ("mbuf: set
On 8/7/2017 5:11 PM, Charles (Chas) Williams wrote:
After commit 8f094a9ac5d7 ("mbuf: set mbuf fields while in pool") is it
much harder to detect a "double free". If the developer makes a copy
of an mbuf pointer and frees it twice, this condition is never detected
and the mbuf gets returned to
After commit 8f094a9ac5d7 ("mbuf: set mbuf fields while in pool") is it
much harder to detect a "double free". If the developer makes a copy
of an mbuf pointer and frees it twice, this condition is never detected
and the mbuf gets returned to the pool twice.
Since this requires extra work to trac
7 matches
Mail list logo
