2016-06-27 13:06, Wiles, Keith:
>
> On 6/27/16, 4:05 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote:
>
> >2016-06-27 10:27, Olivier Matz:
> >> On 06/27/2016 10:21 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> >> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Keith Wiles
> >> >> Move the next pointer to the first cac
On 6/27/16, 4:05 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote:
>2016-06-27 10:27, Olivier Matz:
>> On 06/27/2016 10:21 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Keith Wiles
>> >> Move the next pointer to the first cacheline of the rte_mbuf structure
>> >> and mov
2016-06-27 10:27, Olivier Matz:
> On 06/27/2016 10:21 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Keith Wiles
> >> Move the next pointer to the first cacheline of the rte_mbuf structure
> >> and move the offload values to the second cacheline to give b
On 06/27/2016 10:21 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Keith Wiles
>> Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2016 4:56 PM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2]
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Keith Wiles
> Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2016 4:56 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf:rearrange mbuf to be more mbuf chain
> friendly
>
> Move the n
Move the next pointer to the first cacheline of the rte_mbuf structure
and move the offload values to the second cacheline to give better
performance to applications using chained mbufs.
Enabled by a configuration option CONFIG_RTE_MBUF_CHAIN_FRIENDLY default
is set to No.
Signed-off-by: Keith Wi
6 matches
Mail list logo
