Hi Rahul,
Go ahead. That's fine for me.
Thanks
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Rahul Lakkireddy <
rahul.lakkireddy at chelsio.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 10:50:23 +, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> > Hi Rahul,
> >
> > > However, unsigned long seems to be working fine for all builds.
>
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 10:50:23 +, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
>
> > However, unsigned long seems to be working fine for all builds.
>
> unsigned long it is then, if there aren't any other objections.
>
> Thanks,
> Anatoly
Hi Alejandro,
Are you planning to update the original patc
Hi Anatoly,
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:08:08 +, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > So, as VFIO support for 32bit systems is broken, DPDK should not configure
> > VFIO in that case.
>
> ...Or no one should try and run VFIO on a 32-bit system, which should be
> noted in documentation. I
Hi Alejandro,
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 16:45:01 +0100, Alejandro Lucero wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> From the kernel VFIO maintainer:
>
> "I suppose in the short term, mmap should not be advertised as available
> on 32bit hosts. Thanks,"
>
> So, as VFIO support for 32bit systems is broken, DPDK should
Hi Rahul,
> However, unsigned long seems to be working fine for all builds.
unsigned long it is then, if there aren't any other objections.
Thanks,
Anatoly
Hi all,
> So, as VFIO support for 32bit systems is broken, DPDK should not configure
> VFIO in that case.
...Or no one should try and run VFIO on a 32-bit system, which should be noted
in documentation. I'm a bit wary of adding special handling in this case.
Does making the offset off_t fix th
Hi all,
>From the kernel VFIO maintainer:
"I suppose in the short term, mmap should not be advertised as available
on 32bit hosts. Thanks,"
So, as VFIO support for 32bit systems is broken, DPDK should not configure
VFIO in that case.
This is the complete email sent to the kernel maintainer and
Hi all,
> The last patch from Rahul does not solve the problem. For those cases where
> the MSI-X table is in one of the BARs to map, the memreg array is still in
> use.
Rahul's initial patch was pretty much what you have submitted, it just didn't
build on a 32-bit system.
> My fix was using
I submitted a patch for fixing this issue on the 25th of June. I did not
notice someone had reported this before. The last patch from Rahul does not
solve the problem. For those cases where the MSI-X table is in one of the
BARs to map, the memreg array is still in use.
My fix was using unsigned lo
Hi Anatoly,
Please could you review this fix to allow Chelsio using VFIO?
Thanks
2015-06-23 20:30, Rahul Lakkireddy:
> When using vfio, the probe fails over Chelsio T5 adapters after
> commit-id 90a1633b2 (eal/linux: allow to map BARs with MSI-X tables).
>
> While debugging further, found that th
When using vfio, the probe fails over Chelsio T5 adapters after
commit-id 90a1633b2 (eal/linux: allow to map BARs with MSI-X tables).
While debugging further, found that the BAR region offset and size read from
vfio are u64, but are assigned to uint32_t variables. This results in the u64
value ge
11 matches
Mail list logo
