06/08/2020 12:29, Maxime Coquelin:
> On 8/6/20 1:33 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 25/06/2020 10:04, Maxime Coquelin:
> >> This patch makes rte_dev_probe() to return the
> >> rte_device pointer on success and NULL on error
> >> instead of returning 0 on success and negative
> >> value on error.
> >
On 8/6/20 1:33 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 25/06/2020 10:04, Maxime Coquelin:
>> This patch makes rte_dev_probe() to return the
>> rte_device pointer on success and NULL on error
>> instead of returning 0 on success and negative
>> value on error.
>>
>> The goal is to avoid that the calling app
25/06/2020 10:04, Maxime Coquelin:
> This patch makes rte_dev_probe() to return the
> rte_device pointer on success and NULL on error
> instead of returning 0 on success and negative
> value on error.
>
> The goal is to avoid that the calling application
> iterates the devices list afterwards to r
On 25/06/20 10:04 +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> This patch makes rte_dev_probe() to return the
> rte_device pointer on success and NULL on error
> instead of returning 0 on success and negative
> value on error.
>
> The goal is to avoid that the calling application
> iterates the devices list af
This patch makes rte_dev_probe() to return the
rte_device pointer on success and NULL on error
instead of returning 0 on success and negative
value on error.
The goal is to avoid that the calling application
iterates the devices list afterwards to retrieve
the pointer. Retrieving the pointer is re
5 matches
Mail list logo
