n Jacob Kollanukkaran ; Archana Muniganti
>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add fallback
> session
>
>
> Hi Anoob,
>
> > > > > > Sorry for the late response. But how do you plan to handle
> > > > > > "inl
a API
to sync session state between HW and SW.
Right now, I don't have a clear idea how exactly it should look like.
2. Intel team doesn't plan to work on this API right now.
3. I am happy to review with what you guys will come-up with and provide my
feedback.
Hop
n Jacob Kollanukkaran ; Archana Muniganti
>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add fallback
> session
>
>
>
> Hi Anoob,
>
> > > > Sorry for the late response. But how do you plan to handle "inline
> protocol"
> &
or something else - hard to tell right now.
Konstantin
>
> > Konstantin
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Anoob
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-----
> > > > From: dev On Behalf Of Marcin Smoczynski
> &
n Jacob Kollanukkaran ; Archana Muniganti
>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add fallback
> session
>
>
> Hi Anoob,
>
> >
> > Hi Marcin,
> >
> > Sorry for the late response. But how do you plan to handle "inline prot
19 7:47 PM
> > To: konstantin.anan...@intel.com; akhil.go...@nxp.com
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Marcin Smoczynski
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add fallback
> > session
> >
> > Inline processing is limited to a specified subset o
..@intel.com; akhil.go...@nxp.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Marcin Smoczynski
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add fallback
> session
>
> Inline processing is limited to a specified subset of traffic. It is often
> unable to
> handle more complicated situati
Inline processing is limited to a specified subset of traffic. It is
often unable to handle more complicated situations, such as fragmented
traffic. When using inline processing such traffic is dropped.
Introduce multiple sessions per SA allowing to configure a fallback
lookaside session for packe
8 matches
Mail list logo
