> On Dec 18, 2017, at 9:34 AM, Konstantin Ananyev
> wrote:
>
> Simple functional test for rte_smp_mb() implementations.
> Also when executed on a single lcore could be used as rough
> estimation how many cycles particular implementation of rte_smp_mb()
> might take.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstan
> On Dec 18, 2017, at 9:34 AM, Konstantin Ananyev
> wrote:
>
> Simple functional test for rte_smp_mb() implementations.
> Also when executed on a single lcore could be used as rough
> estimation how many cycles particular implementation of rte_smp_mb()
> might take.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstan
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 5:24 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/test: introduce new test-case for
> rte_smp_mb()
>
>
Hi,
18/12/2017 16:34, Konstantin Ananyev:
> test/test/test_mb.c | 315
>
[...]
> +REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(mb_autotest, test_mb);
For readability, do you agree to rename "mb" to "barrier"
in function and file name?
Simple functional test for rte_smp_mb() implementations.
Also when executed on a single lcore could be used as rough
estimation how many cycles particular implementation of rte_smp_mb()
might take.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev
---
test/test/Makefile | 1 +
test/test/test_mb.c | 315 +
5 matches
Mail list logo
