[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] version: switch to year/month version numbers

2016-02-10 Thread Mcnamara, John
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 3:12 PM > To: Mcnamara, John > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Richardson, Bruce > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] version: switch to year/month version numbers > > ... > > I liked

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] version: switch to year/month version numbers

2016-02-10 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-10 14:33, John McNamara: > /** > * Major version number i.e. the x in x.y.z > */ > -#define RTE_VER_MAJOR 2 > +#define RTE_VER_MAJOR 16 > > /** > * Minor version number i.e. the y in x.y.z > */ > -#define RTE_VER_MINOR 3 > +#define RTE_VER_MINOR 4 > I liked the idea of Bruce

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] version: switch to year/month version numbers

2016-02-10 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 04:11:40PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-02-10 14:33, John McNamara: > > /** > > * Major version number i.e. the x in x.y.z > > */ > > -#define RTE_VER_MAJOR 2 > > +#define RTE_VER_MAJOR 16 > > > > /** > > * Minor version number i.e. the y in x.y.z > > */

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] version: switch to year/month version numbers

2016-02-10 Thread John McNamara
From: "Richardson, Bruce" As discussed on list, switch numbering scheme to be based on year/month. Release 2.3 then becomes 16.04. Ref: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-December/030336.html Also, added zero padding to the month so that it appear as 16.04 and