On 2021/10/26 14:04, Radha Mohan wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 7:04 AM Kevin Laatz wrote:
>>
>> On 21/10/2021 13:59, Chengwen Feng wrote:
>>> From: David Marchand
>>>
>>> No need to expose rte_dma_devices out of the dmadev library.
>>> Existing helpers should be enough, and inlines make use of
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 7:04 AM Kevin Laatz wrote:
>
> On 21/10/2021 13:59, Chengwen Feng wrote:
> > From: David Marchand
> >
> > No need to expose rte_dma_devices out of the dmadev library.
> > Existing helpers should be enough, and inlines make use of
> > rte_dma_fp_objs.
I asked this earlier
On 21/10/2021 13:59, Chengwen Feng wrote:
From: David Marchand
No need to expose rte_dma_devices out of the dmadev library.
Existing helpers should be enough, and inlines make use of
rte_dma_fp_objs.
Signed-off-by: David Marchand
Reviewed-by: Chengwen Feng
Tested-by: Conor Walsh
---
app/t
From: David Marchand
No need to expose rte_dma_devices out of the dmadev library.
Existing helpers should be enough, and inlines make use of
rte_dma_fp_objs.
Signed-off-by: David Marchand
Reviewed-by: Chengwen Feng
Tested-by: Conor Walsh
---
app/test/test_dmadev.c | 5 +++--
lib/dmadev/
4 matches
Mail list logo