'noon,
On 23/10/2015 15:27, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>> +uint32_t __rte_cache_aligned state_flags[RTE_KEEPALIVE_MAXCORES];
> Normally I see the __rte_cache_aligned at the end of the line before
> the ?;? did you have a reason to have it here? If not then I would
> move it to the end to look the sam
Hi Remy, I have few questions inline.
?
Regards,
++Keith Wiles
Intel Corporation
On 9/30/15, 6:04 AM, "dev on behalf of Remy Horton" wrote:
>Adds functions for detecting and reporting the live-ness of LCores,
>the primary requirement of which is minimal overheads for the
>core(s) being c
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Remy Horton
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:05 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] rte: add keep alive functionality
>
> Adds functions for detecting and reporting the live-ness of LCo
Adds functions for detecting and reporting the live-ness of LCores,
the primary requirement of which is minimal overheads for the
core(s) being checked. Core failures are notified via an application
defined callback.
Signed-off-by: Remy Horton
---
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/Makefile|
4 matches
Mail list logo
