On 10/06/20 19:08 +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Hi Gaëtan,
>
> On 6/10/20 2:06 PM, Gaëtan Rivet wrote:
> > Hello Maxime,
> >
> > On 08/06/20 17:53 +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> >> This patch makes rte_dev_probe() to return the
> >> rte_device pointer on success and NULL on error
> >> instead
Hi Gaëtan,
On 6/10/20 2:06 PM, Gaëtan Rivet wrote:
> Hello Maxime,
>
> On 08/06/20 17:53 +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>> This patch makes rte_dev_probe() to return the
>> rte_device pointer on success and NULL on error
>> instead of returning 0 on success and negative
>> value on error.
>>
>> Th
Hello Maxime,
On 08/06/20 17:53 +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> This patch makes rte_dev_probe() to return the
> rte_device pointer on success and NULL on error
> instead of returning 0 on success and negative
> value on error.
>
> The goal is to avoid that the calling application
> iterates the
This patch makes rte_dev_probe() to return the
rte_device pointer on success and NULL on error
instead of returning 0 on success and negative
value on error.
The goal is to avoid that the calling application
iterates the devices list afterwards to retrieve
the pointer. Retrieving the pointer is re
4 matches
Mail list logo