Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] doc: add section describing new abi versions

2020-08-12 Thread Thomas Monjalon
12/08/2020 13:19, Kinsella, Ray: > On 12/08/2020 11:40, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >> --- a/doc/guides/contributing/abi_versioning.rst > >> +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/abi_versioning.rst > >> @@ -673,9 +673,9 @@ symbols. > >> -BIND_DEFAULT_SYMBOL(rte_acl_create, _v20, 20); > >> +BIND_DEFAULT_SY

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] doc: add section describing new abi versions

2020-08-12 Thread Kinsella, Ray
v4 on the way, other notes are below. On 12/08/2020 11:40, Thomas Monjalon wrote: [SNIP] >> Experimental >> >> >> +Major ABI versions are usually but not always declared aligned with a >> +:ref:`LTS release `. > > Why adding this sentence here? Will remove. > > >> + >> APIs >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] doc: add section describing new abi versions

2020-08-12 Thread Thomas Monjalon
In the title and below, s/abi/ABI/ 11/08/2020 18:39, Ray Kinsella: > Added a section describing new abi versions, this provides pointers to > the relevant amended rules that apply during the abi breakage window. > Also remove the large note a the head of the abi policy describing the s/a/at/ > a

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] doc: add section describing new abi versions

2020-08-11 Thread Ray Kinsella
Added a section describing new abi versions, this provides pointers to the relevant amended rules that apply during the abi breakage window. Also remove the large note a the head of the abi policy describing the abi stability process that has taken place over the previous year. Signed-off-by: Ray