Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mbuf: minor cleanup

2020-11-04 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 1:56 PM > > Hi Morten, > Any update about this patch please? Thomas, v4 contains all the modifications suggested by Olivier: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/82198/ Except a depreciation notice about the old

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mbuf: minor cleanup

2020-10-20 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hi Morten, Any update about this patch please? 07/10/2020 11:16, Olivier Matz: > Hi Morten, > > Thanks for this cleanup. Please see some comments below. > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:40:13PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote: > > The mbuf header files had some commenting style errors that affected the

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mbuf: minor cleanup

2020-10-07 Thread Olivier Matz
Hi Morten, Thanks for this cleanup. Please see some comments below. On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:40:13PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote: > The mbuf header files had some commenting style errors that affected the > API documentation. > Also, the RTE_ prefix was missing on a macro and a definition. > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mbuf: minor cleanup

2020-09-16 Thread Morten Brørup
The mbuf header files had some commenting style errors that affected the API documentation. Also, the RTE_ prefix was missing on a macro and a definition. Note: This patch does not touch the offload and attachment flags that are also missing the RTE_ prefix. Changes only affecting documentation:

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mbuf: minor cleanup

2020-09-16 Thread Morten Brørup
The mbuf header files had some commenting style errors that affected the API documentation. Also, the RTE_ prefix was missing on a macro and a definition. Note: This patch does not touch the offload and attachment flags that are also missing the RTE_ prefix. Changes only affecting documentation: