On 10/19/2017 2:15 PM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> When trying to attach a port as a sub-device, the ethdev port
> was compared with devargs.
> In the case of a PCI device, the name in devargs is the PCI address.
> And since DPDK 17.08, the devargs name of the underlying device was
> used to match an
When trying to attach a port as a sub-device, the ethdev port
was compared with devargs.
In the case of a PCI device, the name in devargs is the PCI address.
And since DPDK 17.08, the devargs name of the underlying device was
used to match an ethdev port:
a1e7c17555e8 ("ethdev: use device n
2 matches
Mail list logo
