[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix issues with VFIO

2014-06-19 Thread Thomas Monjalon
> > This patchset fixes an issue with VFIO where DPDK initialization could > > fail even if the user didn't want to use VFIO in the first place. Also, > > more verbose and descriptive error messages were added to VFIO code, for > > example distinguishing between a failed ioctl() call and an unsuppo

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix issues with VFIO

2014-06-18 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Burakov, Anatoly > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 8:07 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Richardson, Bruce; nhorman at tuxdriver.com > Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix issues with VFIO > > This patchset fixes an issue with VFIO where DPDK initialization could > fail ev

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix issues with VFIO

2014-06-18 Thread Anatoly Burakov
This patchset fixes an issue with VFIO where DPDK initialization could fail even if the user didn't want to use VFIO in the first place. Also, more verbose and descriptive error messages were added to VFIO code, for example distinguishing between a failed ioctl() call and an unsupported VFIO API ve

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix issues with VFIO

2014-06-18 Thread Neil Horman
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 04:07:15PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote: > This patchset fixes an issue with VFIO where DPDK initialization could > fail even if the user didn't want to use VFIO in the first place. Also, > more verbose and descriptive error messages were added to VFIO code, for > example di