Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 04/14] baseband/turbo_sw: support large size code block

2020-03-25 Thread Chautru, Nicolas
From: Akhil Goyal >> +if (seg->length > 64000) { >Shouldn't this be seg->length + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM and you don't need A >check again in assert. >64000 should be a MACRO Adding macro for this at rte_bbdev level in new version uploaded today. >> +data

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 04/14] baseband/turbo_sw: support large size code block

2020-03-25 Thread Akhil Goyal
> > From: Nic Chautru > > This is to support cases when the input data for > decoding a code block is larger than 64kB and would > not fit as a contiguous block of data into one > mbuf. In that case the length from the opearation > supersedes the mbug default structure. Spell check Operation

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 04/14] baseband/turbo_sw: support large size code block

2020-03-13 Thread Dave Burley
Acked-by: Dave Burley On 04/03/2020 18:54, Nicolas Chautru wrote: From: Nic Chautru This is to support cases when the input data for decoding a code block is larger than 64kB and would not fit as a contiguous block of data into one mbuf. In that case the length from the opearation supersedes

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 04/14] baseband/turbo_sw: support large size code block

2020-03-04 Thread Nicolas Chautru
From: Nic Chautru This is to support cases when the input data for decoding a code block is larger than 64kB and would not fit as a contiguous block of data into one mbuf. In that case the length from the opearation supersedes the mbug default structure. Signed-off-by: Nic Chautru --- app/test