On 6/26/20 4:04 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> There is no more notion of device ID outside of vdpa.c.
> We can now move from array to linked-list model for keeping
> track of the vDPA devices.
>
> There is no point in using array here, as all vDPA API are
> used from the control path, so no perf
There is no more notion of device ID outside of vdpa.c.
We can now move from array to linked-list model for keeping
track of the vDPA devices.
There is no point in using array here, as all vDPA API are
used from the control path, so no performance concerns.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin
---
li
On 6/26/20 3:27 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> -rte_vdpa_unregister_device(struct rte_vdpa_device *vdev)
> +rte_vdpa_unregister_device(struct rte_vdpa_device *dev)
> {
> - int i;
> + struct rte_vdpa_device *cur_dev, *tmp_dev;
> + int ret = -1;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < MAX_VHOST_DEV
There is no more notion of device ID outside of vdpa.c.
We can now move from array to linked-list model for keeping
track of the vDPA devices.
There is no point in using array here, as all vDPA API are
used from the control path, so no performance concerns.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin
---
li
4 matches
Mail list logo
